T.W.I.G. notes: January 3, 2016

Mail order plants:

  • Chief River Nursery:  Many varieties of trees and shrubs.  Of particular interest to me are hazelnut, Nanking cherry, gray dogwood, American chestnut, and quaking aspen
  • Willis Orchard Co.:  Of particular interest are Methley plum, paw paw, and American persimmon
  • Oikos Tree Crops:  Of particular interest are running serviceberry, several species of native dogwood shrubs (this and this), American persimmon, paw paw, and multiple varieties of plums including several beach plum cultivars.
  • Fedco Seeds:  In Waterville, ME.  Broad selection of fruit and trees, tubers, vegetable seeds.

The Fruit Nut is a nice resource for uncommon fruit and nuts.

Make your own raspberry trellis

The ethics of cyber-enhancements

Transhumanism, n.:  The belief or theory that the human race can evolve beyond its current physical and mental limitations, especially by means of science and technology.

Cyborg, n.:  a person whose body contains mechanical or electrical devices and whose abilities are greater than the abilities of normal humans

Humanity, n.:  the quality or state of being human

There are two blogs that I check every day, Brad DeLong’s Grasping Reality with Both Hands and Mike the Mad Biologist.   The other day Brad had a post, (Early) Monday Idiocy: Chris Bertram Wages War on Eyeglasses, Surrenders to Cyborgs.  It was a critique of a critique of a post by econoblogger Noah Smith, Rise of the Cyborgs.  You can follow the links if you’re interested in the details.  The purpose of this post is to clarify comments I left on DeLong’s blog, respond to questions and criticisms, and to provide another forum for continuing the discussion.

Continue reading

Weekly Digest – December 20, 2015

Must Read

Should Read

Continue reading

Weekly Digest – December 13, 2015

Must Read

Should Read

Continue reading

Sanders voters

From John Judis’, The Bern Supremacy (boldface mine):

But who are the voters flock­ing to [Bernie Sanders’] mes­sage? Sanders of­ten uses the term “work­ing people” to refer to the con­stitu­ency he wants to lead. It’s a term that con­jures guys in over­alls; yet the bulk of the people at the ral­lies I at­ten­ded were col­lege stu­dents, re­cent col­lege gradu­ates, or white-col­lar pro­fes­sion­als who have the types of jobs that re­quire a col­lege or even a post-gradu­ate de­gree.

At the Sanders rally in Las Ve­gas, I in­ter­viewed about 30 people and also cir­cu­lated around the crowd. I did talk to a jan­it­or from Las Ve­gas’s mil­it­ant culin­ary uni­on and to a re­tired auto mech­an­ic from Idaho who had moved to Las Ve­gas, but the rest of the people I en­countered were stu­dents, teach­ers, sci­ent­ists, civil ser­vants, and so­cial work­ers. At a Sanders rally at George Ma­son Uni­versity in Fair­fax, Vir­gin­ia, I found a sim­il­ar crowd, with gov­ern­ment con­sult­ants, IT ad­min­is­trat­ors, and en­gin­eers also thrown in­to the mix.

These Sanders sup­port­ers are part of a strat­um of the Amer­ic­an labor force that the census des­ig­nates as “pro­fes­sion­als.” They most of­ten work for a wage or salary. They pro­duce ideas and soph­ist­ic­ated ser­vices rather than phys­ic­al goods. They work in hos­pitals and clin­ics, schools and col­leges, and, above all, of­fices. Un­like routine ser­vice work­ers, they make de­cent or even very good money. In White Col­lar, which ap­peared in 1951, C. Wright Mills labeled this group “the new middle class.” The French so­ci­olo­gist Serge Mal­let called them the “new work­ing class.” At the so­cial­ist journ­al I helped edit in the early 1970s, we called them “edu­cated labor” and part of a new “di­ver­si­fied pro­let­ari­at.”

Continue reading