First Direct Observation of Carbon Dioxide’s Increasing Greenhouse Effect at the Earth’s Surface

It’s kind of amazing to me that it took so long for there to be a direct experimental measurement of CO2 forcing in the field.   Spoiler alert:  Their observations were fully consistent with what theory predicts.

The effects of CO2 on radiative transfer are well-understood but apparently there’s never been direct measurement of radiative forcing at the Earth’s surface.   What’s novel (I think, having read just the Abstract of the paper not the full text) is that they directly measured heat transfer rather than inferring it from a network of temperature sensors (or satellite measurements) and independently verified radiative transfer models.  In short, their measurements are an additional test of things we believed to be true based on other measurements.   Had their measurements not been consistent with model predictions that would have been a big surprise and would merit further investigation.  Bottom line:  The CO2 contribution to net radiative forcing is well-understood.  Anthropogenic CO2 emissions have caused the Earth to retain (and it will continue to retain) a significant amount of heat above what it would without them.   The specifics of where that excess heat ends up – atmosphere near the surface?  oceans? – is a subject of ongoing investigation but make no mistake we’re retaining a massive amount of excess heat.   And bear in mind average surface temperature changes, however small they may seem, are really proxies for much more significant climatological effects.

From Lawrence Berkeley Lab’s press release, “First Direct Observation of Carbon Dioxide’s Increasing Greenhouse Effect at the Earth’s Surface”:

Scientists have observed an increase in carbon dioxide’s greenhouse effect at the Earth’s surface for the first time. The researchers, led by scientists from the US Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab), measured atmospheric carbon dioxide’s increasing capacity to absorb thermal radiation emitted from the Earth’s surface over an eleven-year period at two locations in North America. They attributed this upward trend to rising CO2 levels from fossil fuel emissions.

The influence of atmospheric CO2 on the balance between incoming energy from the Sun and outgoing heat from the Earth (also called the planet’s energy balance) is well established. But this effect has not been experimentally confirmed outside the laboratory until now. The research is reported Wednesday, Feb. 25, in the advance online publication of the journal Nature.

The results agree with theoretical predictions of the greenhouse effect due to human activity. The research also provides further confirmation that the calculations used in today’s climate models are on track when it comes to representing the impact of CO2.

Read or download the paper here.  (It’s $5 to rent and $32 (!!) to buy a copy.   At those prices I recommend visiting your local college or university science library and reading the copy of Nature they have on the shelf.)

Thought for the Day: 23 February 2015

Once S Fred Singer debated Sherry Rowland about ozone depletion on NPR. Every atmospheric scientist I talked to was amused that Rowland had obviously crushed Singer. Non-scientists thought that Singer held up fairly well (he has – he is really old). There is the problem. Competent scientists know that Singer, Soon, Baliunas and Seitz were pedaling BS in their opposition to protecting the ozone layer. Reagan and Bush knew it and they were the ones that provided knowing leadership to the world concerning the Montreal Protocol. And the Protocol has worked. the abundance of ozone depleting substances has decreased and the decrease in global stratospheric ozone has been arrested. The ozone hole will go away in the future if the world stays at it.

Competent scientists know that Soon’s rants about climate are garbage….  What to say about the folks who choose to believe that Soon is a scientist and that his objections to climate science are significant? Put these people in a functional MRI and you find that the part of their brain that responds to his BS is the part that responds to cocaine. It is not the part that does algebra.

If you do associate with denialists, go have coffee with them and listen to them. I send them something from my course first. Like the First Law treatment of climate. Respect and renewables may rewire brains – rants won’t.

That’s the way it is.

–  “James Wilson” in the NYTimes comment section

What is the Madden-Julian Oscillation?

Local meteorologist David Epstein has a nice discussion of the medium-range weather forecast for the New England region on boston.com, January Will Arrive On A Cold Note.  (His Weather Wisdom posts are very good in general.)  El Nino and the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) featured in his discussion.   El Nino comes up pretty regularly in weather discussions but the Madden-Julian Oscillation?  I’d never heard of it.  From NOAA:

The Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) is a tropical disturbance that propagates eastward around the global tropics with a cycle on the order of 30-60 days. The MJO has wide ranging impacts on the patterns of tropical and extratropical precipitation, atmospheric circulation, and surface temperature around the global tropics and subtropics. There is evidence that the MJO influences the [El Niño/Southern Oscillation] cycle. It does not cause El Niño or La Niña, but can contribute to the speed of development and intensity of El Niño and La Niña episodes.

Continue reading