Unfortunately, while the Founding Fathers did foresee the possibility of personalistic rule, they did not expect Congress to betray the Constitution and become the willing toadies of the wannabe dictator.
– Steve Metz
Unfortunately, while the Founding Fathers did foresee the possibility of personalistic rule, they did not expect Congress to betray the Constitution and become the willing toadies of the wannabe dictator.
– Steve Metz
Knowledge of how things work necessarily reduces the “diversity of perspectives” along some dimensions. We reject views that are demonstrably false.
Overheard: When you smear lamb’s blood above your door so J.D. Vance doesn’t visit… Assover.
Someone should ask Hegseth why F/A-18s have started identifying as submarines under his watch. Is that “warrior culture”?
Update: Third F/A-18 in the drink! “Super Hornet” to be renamed “Lemming.” More seriously, three?!? WTF?
Due process is what distinguishes us as a people from the monsters who do commit heinous crimes. If there’s no due process, we’re a society that can just lynch people on an accusation, with no need to get it right.
-Aaron Reichlin-Melnick
“Whatever may have been my political opinions before, I have but one sentiment now: that is, we have a government, and laws, and a flag, and they must all be sustained. There are but two parties now: traitors and patriots. And I want hereafter to be ranked with the latter.”
– U.S. Grant (1861)
They were careless people, Tom and Daisy — they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness or whatever it was that held them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made.
– F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby.
As much as left-wing identity politics are counterproductive and annoying, right-wing identity politics are vile. Trump and co are right-wing identity politics 24/7/365.
Michael Ignatieff, I was born liberal. The ‘adults in the room’ still have a lot to learn:
By the late 1990s, the conservatives began to gain power by playing to the resentments of the ignored. The authoritarian right, especially, understood that it could build an entire politics on mocking the blindness of the liberal elite. It didn’t need solutions; stoking the rage was enough. We are now the embattled object of that rage. What will it take to earn the trust of those whose discontent we ignored? Liberalism in the next generation will need to save social solidarity from the “creative destruction” of the market by rebuilding the fiscal capacity of the liberal state and investing in the public goods that underpin a common life for all. Saying this, at a high level of generality, is easy enough: The tougher part will be finding the language and the cunning to convert a radical liberalism into a politics that wins elections and a governing strategy that pushes change through the veto-rich thicket of interests waiting to derail our best-laid plans.