Thought for the Day: January 25, 2016

Corey Robin:

There’s a lot of fretting — both well meaning and cynical — out there about whether Sanders can win.

Here’s the deal, people. For the last decade and a half, we’ve been treated to lecture after lecture from on high about how if you want things to change, you have to build from below. Well, that process has been going on for some time.

Unlike purists of the Left and purists of the center (who are the most insufferable purists of all, precisely because they think they’re not), I look at the various fits and starts of the last fifteen years — from Seattle to the Nader campaign to the Iraq War protests to the Dean campaign to the Obama campaign to Occupy to the various student debt campaigns to Black Lives Matter — as part of a continuum, where men and women, young and old, slowly relearn the art of politics.

Whose first rule is: if you want x, shoot for 1,000x, and whose second rule is: it’s not whether you fail (you probably will), but how you fail, whether you and your comrades are still there afterward to pick up the pieces and learn from your mistakes.

Continue reading

Sanders voters

From John Judis’, The Bern Supremacy (boldface mine):

But who are the voters flock­ing to [Bernie Sanders’] mes­sage? Sanders of­ten uses the term “work­ing people” to refer to the con­stitu­ency he wants to lead. It’s a term that con­jures guys in over­alls; yet the bulk of the people at the ral­lies I at­ten­ded were col­lege stu­dents, re­cent col­lege gradu­ates, or white-col­lar pro­fes­sion­als who have the types of jobs that re­quire a col­lege or even a post-gradu­ate de­gree.

At the Sanders rally in Las Ve­gas, I in­ter­viewed about 30 people and also cir­cu­lated around the crowd. I did talk to a jan­it­or from Las Ve­gas’s mil­it­ant culin­ary uni­on and to a re­tired auto mech­an­ic from Idaho who had moved to Las Ve­gas, but the rest of the people I en­countered were stu­dents, teach­ers, sci­ent­ists, civil ser­vants, and so­cial work­ers. At a Sanders rally at George Ma­son Uni­versity in Fair­fax, Vir­gin­ia, I found a sim­il­ar crowd, with gov­ern­ment con­sult­ants, IT ad­min­is­trat­ors, and en­gin­eers also thrown in­to the mix.

These Sanders sup­port­ers are part of a strat­um of the Amer­ic­an labor force that the census des­ig­nates as “pro­fes­sion­als.” They most of­ten work for a wage or salary. They pro­duce ideas and soph­ist­ic­ated ser­vices rather than phys­ic­al goods. They work in hos­pitals and clin­ics, schools and col­leges, and, above all, of­fices. Un­like routine ser­vice work­ers, they make de­cent or even very good money. In White Col­lar, which ap­peared in 1951, C. Wright Mills labeled this group “the new middle class.” The French so­ci­olo­gist Serge Mal­let called them the “new work­ing class.” At the so­cial­ist journ­al I helped edit in the early 1970s, we called them “edu­cated labor” and part of a new “di­ver­si­fied pro­let­ari­at.”

Continue reading

Thought for the Day – November 27, 2015

I am not a Know-Nothing. That is certain. How could I be? How can any one who abhors the oppression of negroes, be in favor of degrading classes of white people? Our progress in degeneracy appears to me to be pretty rapid. As a nation, we begin by declaring that “all men are created equal.” We now practically read it “all men are created equal, except negroes.” When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read “all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and catholics.” When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty-to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy.

Abraham Lincoln

In the event you were under the impression that Russia gives a rat’s ass about Syrians

From today’s New York Times:

Some Russian analysts say the Kremlin is using the conflict in Syria to test a new generation of weaponry from a major procurement program that military officials began in 2010 after years of oil-boom profits.

“There are radars and all sorts of new control systems, and of course we need a firing range,” Konstantin V. Remchukov, the editor of Nezavisimaya Gazeta, told the Echo of Moscow radio station this week.

“We carried out a lot of exercises,” Mr. Remchukov said. “But a firing range like that opening before us in Syria, with these bombing sorties, with drones and other objects of the new generation, this is, of course, a favorable place for fine-tuning all our new weaponry.”