Thought for the Day – March 31, 2017

Bacevich’s ten principles for reducing U.S. tendencies toward militarism:

  1. Pay attention to the nation’s founders,
  2. Bolster the separation of powers,
  3. Treat the use of armed force solely as a last resort,
  4. Strengthen U.S. self-sufficiency,
  5. Emphasize national defense,
  6. Control defense spending,
  7. Use more soft power,
  8. Emphasize citizen-soldiers,
  9. Use the National Guard and reserves properly, and
  10. Improve U.S. civil-military relations.

Thought for the Day – March 30, 2017

A liberalism that needs monsters to destroy can never politically engage with its enemies. It can never understand those enemies as political actors, making calculations, taking advantage of opportunities, and responding to constraints. It can never see in those enemies anything other than a black hole of motivation, a cesspool where reason goes to die. Hence the refusal of empathy for Trump’s supporters. Insofar as it marks a demand that we not abandon antiracist principle and practice for the sake of winning over a mythicized white working class, the refusal is unimpeachable. But like the know-nothing disavowal of knowledge after 9/11, when explanations of terrorism were construed as exonerations of terrorism, the refusal of empathy since 11/9 is a will to ignorance. Far simpler to imagine Trump voters as possessed by a kind of demonic intelligence, or anti-intelligence, transcending all the rules of the established order. Rather than treat Trump as the outgrowth of normal politics and traditional institutions — it is the Electoral College, after all, not some beating heart of darkness, that sent Trump to the White House — there is a disabling insistence that he and his forces are like no political formation we’ve seen. By encouraging us to see only novelty in his monstrosity, analyses of this kind may prove as crippling as the neocons’ assessment of Saddam’s regime. That, too, was held to be like no tyranny we’d seen, a despotism where the ordinary rules of politics didn’t apply and knowledge of the subject was therefore useless.

Corey Robin

Reading Material – March 25, 2017

Reading material – March 19, 2017

Must Read

Should Read/Listen

Music for Sunday morning

There are times when it is appropriate to bow your head in quiet contemplation and there are times when it is appropriate to raise your arms up, look to the heavens, and feel joy for the things which make us beautiful and full of light.  This song, which we used to sing at Boy Scout camp when I was a teenager, is appropriate for the latter.  Rise and shine.

Reading material – March 12, 2017

I’ve taken over as admin of our local Democratic Town Committee’s Facebook page and Twitter feed so I’ve shifted focus a bit from spending time reading articles of personal interest to more of a focus on cultivating common ground on political issues.  That stated, I haven’t stopped reading for personal interest.  (Side note:  If you have any insights on how to build a Twitter following, please let me know.)

And things Democratic party leadership needs to pay a lot more attention too (I think the majority of the rank-and-file gets this stuff but understanding is a bit slow to percolate up – looking at you Schumer, Pelosi, Hoyer, et al.  Giving Tom Perez a few months to get things in order before adding him to the list.):

Twenty questions for President Trump

From Benjamin Wittes:

  1. Are you making the allegation that President Obama conducted electronic surveillance of Trump Tower in your capacity as President of the United States based on intelligence or law enforcement information available to you in that capacity?
  2. If so—that is, if you have executive branch information validating that either a FISA wiretap or a Title III wiretap took place—have you reviewed the applications for the surveillance and have you or your lawyers concluded that they lack merit?
  3. If you know that a FISA wiretap took place, are you or were you at the time of the application, an agent of a foreign power within the meaning of FISA?
  4. Was anyone else working in Trump Tower an agent of a foreign power within the meaning of FISA?
  5. If you know that a Title III wiretap took place, are you or were you at the time of the application engaged in criminal activity that would support a Title III wiretap or might you have previously engaged in criminal activity that might legitimately be the subject of a Title III wiretap?
  6. Was anyone else working in Trump Tower engaged in criminal activity that would support a Title III wiretap or might another person have previously engaged in criminal activity that might legitimately be the subject of a Title III wiretap?
  7. If you were tweeting not based on knowledge received as chief executive of the United States, were you tweeting in your capacity as a reader of Breitbart or a listener of Mark Levin’s radio show?
  8. If so, on what basis are you confident the stories and allegations in these august outlets are true and accurate vis a vis the activity of the government you, in fact, now head?
  9. If you learned of this alleged surveillance from media outlets, did you or anyone on your staff check with any responsible law enforcement or intelligence officials or agencies before making public allegations against your own government?
  10. What exactly does any of this have to do with Arnold Schwarzenegger?

And ten more:

Continue reading